Bitewing
Book
For finance leaders

Report exposure without losing the evidence behind it.

Candidate variance, reviewable exposure, submitted amount, and confirmed recovery are four different stages. Bitewing keeps them apart, and keeps each one linked to the findings behind it.

Book a walkthroughSee a sample finding
  • Board-ready
  • Source-backed exposure
Reviewable exposure · one finding$239$239 under expected. Candidate, reviewable, submitted, and confirmed stay separate.
  1. PayerPayer A · Network partner
  2. LocationLocation 14
  3. Finding8291-E
  4. SourceRemittance line, attached
Sample · No PHIDrill from the slide to the line
Exposure bridge · this period
Candidate variance walks down to what is evidence-qualified.
Sample ledger · no PHI
Gross candidate variance walks down to reviewable exposure, then separates submitted and recovered stages.
CandidateCandidatevarianceHoldMissing sourcecoverageHoldExpired filingwindowsHoldContext stillunder reviewHoldReviewerrejectionReviewableReviewableamountTrackedConfirmed recoveryto date
Subtotal
Candidate
Candidate variance

4 rows under expected, summed before any check.

Opens8291-E0284-C0274-G0271-K
Separate the money states

Candidate, reviewable, submitted, and confirmed recovery are four different stages.

Finance reporting breaks when these collapse into one. Bitewing keeps measured variance, evidence-qualified exposure, submitted amount, and confirmed recovery apart, with the definition one click away.

Candidate varianceCandidate

Potential exposure before evidence and review holds are removed.

Reviewable exposureReviewable

The portion with enough source evidence and context for team review.

Submitted amountSubmitted

Amount your team approved for the customer-approved recovery path.

Confirmed recoveryRecovered

Recovered cash after payer response and reconciliation.

Payer concentration with proof

Which payer groups drive reviewed exposure, ranked, not sliced.

Concentration is only useful when each bar links back to findings and source status, so this view is ranked and every row keeps its proof attached.

Ranked concentration
Reviewed exposure by submitting payer
Sample data · no PHI
  • 01Payer A
    Impact rangePrimary
    2 findings under expected · links to source state
  • 02Payer C
    Impact rangeSecondary
    1 finding under expected · links to source state
  • 03Payer B
    Impact rangeWatch
    1 finding under expected · links to source state
Ranked concentration across 3 payer groups · sample ledger
Compare locations fairly

Exposure means nothing without volume and coverage beside it.

A small source group with thin evidence coverage is not the same risk as a larger one with complete sources. Bitewing shows claim volume, evidence coverage, and exposure on one line so source groups are compared on equal terms.

Source groupClaimsEvidence coverageReviewed exposure
Location 14
Claims482
Coverage
100%
Exposure
$239
Location 09
Claims358
Coverage
0%
Exposure
$47
Location 21
Claims276
Coverage
0%
Exposure
$25
Location 06
Claims194
Coverage
0%
Exposure
$18
Location 03
Claims331
Coverage
100%
Exposure
$0
Location 07
Claims219
Coverage
100%
Exposure
$0
Human reviewAmber coverage means at least one source gap holds findings back for that source group.
Board-ready reporting

A board number that still knows where it came from.

Export the reviewable figure to the board deck and keep the path back, payer, location, finding, source. The number on the slide drills to the EOB line that produced it, so finance reports only what it can defend.

01Board deck · reimbursement

The slide.

One figure: reviewable exposure. Candidate variance is shown beside it, never summed into it.

Reviewable exposure · sample ledger$239Candidate $329 across 4 rows under expected · 3 heldDrills to the line ↓
02Payer · candidate variance

Which payer.

Ranked, not sliced, before any hold is removed. Each bar keeps its findings and their source state.

  • Payer A$2862 findings
  • Payer C$251 finding
  • Payer B$181 finding
03Location

Which location.

Exposure beside volume and coverage, so groups are compared on equal terms.

  • Location 14Procedure AEvidence complete$239 under
  • Location 09Procedure EEvidence stale$47 under
04Finding · EOB line

The line it came from.

8291-E: $890 expected, $651 allowed, $239 under expected. The remittance line is attached, so the board number is defensible to the cent.

Remittance · ERA 835 · sample excerptLocation 14
Claim8291-E
Service date2026-03-12
ProcedureProcedure A
Billed charge$1,180
Allowed amount · this line$651
Plan paid$512
Patient responsibility$139
Adjustment · Sample adjustment$529

The actual allowed amount is read from this remittance line. Nothing is keyed in by hand, and the line stays attached to the finding so a reviewer can open it before trusting the number.

Bring your own ledger and see the bridge on it.

Inspect one fully traceable finding, then walk the same exposure bridge against your own claims with the source citations still attached.

Book a walkthroughInspect a sample finding