One source-readiness view across locations, contracts, and payer relationships. Nothing changes in the practices on day one.
The payer the claim went to.
The route that priced a claim stays attached to its finding. When the same route keeps coming up short, Bitewing keeps those findings together, so contracting takes one packet to the payer with the source line for each.
Submitted to one payer, priced through another entity, on the schedule active that day. The route stays attached to the finding.
The payer the claim went to.
A repeated shortfall on one route is a pattern, not six unrelated rows. Bitewing keeps them together so the evidence is reviewed once.
Route, schedule version, the findings on it, and the source line for each. A person sends it, through the channel you already use.
A source group is ready when the sources behind its findings are current and someone owns the next step. The matrix shows where each group stands, so a gap is a specific request - never a practice-level fire drill.
Location group 18 is not an office problem. It needs one contract source, Contracting owns the request, and the related work stays held until the source lands.
This candidate stays held until the contract source lands. The source gap is named before the amount can become reviewable.
Rollout is explicit about what changes and what stays the same. Read-only to start, one prioritized work surface instead of a new inbox, and reviewed work that travels through the channels you already approved.
Bitewing reads customer-approved reimbursement sources. Nothing posts, nothing edits, nothing sends.
Your PMS, clearinghouse, and posting workflow are untouched on day one.
Held findings surface in one queue with an owner on each, not a new inbox for each office.
Teams keep working their existing day; the queue points to the next gap, not more tabs.
Reviewed work moves through the channel you already use - with source citations still attached.
No payer is contacted automatically. A reviewer decides what goes out, and when.
A higher eligible-findings count means nothing if the supporting sources are thin. Every comparison row carries the coverage that backs it, so a provisional number reads as provisional - not as a verdict on an office.
